Reviewer

Global Nexus Mathematics (GNM) collaborates with qualified reviewers who are experts in various domains of mathematics education. Our reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the scientific quality of each manuscript through a rigorous, double-blind peer-review process.

All reviewers of NUMED are selected based on their academic qualifications, research experience, publication track records in reputable journals, and professional integrity. We strive to ensure diversity in academic backgrounds, geographical distribution, and institutional affiliation.

Reviewer Criteria:

To become a reviewer of NUMED, scholars should meet the following minimum criteria:

  • Hold at least a doctoral degree (Ph.D./Ed.D.) in mathematics education or related fields

  • Have published scholarly articles in national accredited journals (SINTA 1/2) or international journals indexed by Scopus, Web of Science, or equivalent databases

  • Demonstrate research expertise relevant to the journal’s focus and scope

  • Commit to timely and objective reviews, in accordance with ethical guidelines

Our Reviewers Include:

  • Dr. Ahmad Rustam, M.Pd.
    Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
    Areas of Expertise: Mathematics Teaching Methods, Higher-Order Thinking Skills

  • Dr. Kadir, M.Pd.
    Universitas Haluoleo, Indonesia
    Areas of Expertise: Curriculum Development, Inclusive Mathematics Education

  • Dr. Ahsanul Khaidar Asdar
    Tangerang Sriwijaya State High School of Budhism, Indonesia
    Areas of Expertise: Equity in Mathematics Education, Assessment

  • Dr. Muhammad Ghiyats Ristiana, S.Mat., M.Pd.
    IKIP Siliwangi, Indonesia
    Areas of Expertise: Mathematics Teacher Education, Contextual Learning

  • Dr. Joko Prabowo, M.Sc.
    Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
    Areas of Expertise: Mathematical Literacy, Quantitative Research

  • Dr. Elena Smirnova
    Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia
    Areas of Expertise: Mathematics Teacher Education, Comparative Education

Review Policy

  • Type of Review: Double-blind peer review

  • Review Timeframe: Typically within 2–4 weeks after submission

  • Ethics Compliance: Reviewers are expected to follow COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines and maintain strict confidentiality.

We express our sincere gratitude to all reviewers for their invaluable contributions to the academic quality and integrity of our journal.